做一次小小的备份,等会又删掉了

specs/001-fiber-middleware-integration/checklists/requirements.md

@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+# Specification Quality Checklist: Fiber Middleware Integration with Configuration Management
+
+**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning  
+**Created**: 2025-11-10  
+**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
+
+## Content Quality
+
+- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
+- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
+- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
+- [x] All mandatory sections completed
+
+## Requirement Completeness
+
+- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
+- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
+- [x] Success criteria are measurable
+- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
+- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
+- [x] Edge cases are identified
+- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
+- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
+
+## Feature Readiness
+
+- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
+- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
+- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
+- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
+
+## Validation Results
+
+### Content Quality Assessment
+
+✅ **PASS**: The specification focuses on user value and business outcomes without implementation details. While technical components (Viper, Zap, Redis) are mentioned in the functional requirements, they describe **what capabilities** the system must provide (configuration management, structured logging, token validation) rather than **how to implement** them. The Technical Requirements section appropriately references the project constitution's technology choices.
+
+✅ **PASS**: The specification is written from a business/operations perspective with user stories framed around administrator needs, API consumer expectations, and system reliability outcomes.
+
+✅ **PASS**: All mandatory sections (User Scenarios, Requirements, Success Criteria) are completed with detailed content.
+
+### Requirement Completeness Assessment
+
+✅ **PASS**: No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers present. All requirements are concrete and specific.
+
+✅ **PASS**: All functional requirements are testable with clear expected behaviors (e.g., "detect changes within 5 seconds", "return HTTP 401 with specific error format").
+
+✅ **PASS**: Success criteria include specific measurable metrics:
+- Time-based: "within 5 seconds", "within 50ms", "within 100ms"
+- Percentage-based: "100% consistency", "100% of HTTP requests"  
+- Behavior-based: "automatically rotate when reaching configured size limits"
+
+✅ **PASS**: Success criteria are technology-agnostic, focusing on user/system outcomes (e.g., "System administrators can modify configuration and see it applied" rather than "Viper watches config files").
+
+✅ **PASS**: All user stories include detailed acceptance scenarios in Given-When-Then format.
+
+✅ **PASS**: Edge cases section covers 7 different failure/boundary scenarios with expected behaviors.
+
+✅ **PASS**: Scope is clearly bounded through prioritized user stories (P1, P2, P3) and explicitly states rate limiting is "implemented but disabled by default".
+
+✅ **PASS**: Dependencies identified through Technical Requirements section referencing constitution standards, and implicit dependencies on Redis for token validation.
+
+### Feature Readiness Assessment
+
+✅ **PASS**: Each of the 22 functional requirements maps to acceptance scenarios in user stories and success criteria.
+
+✅ **PASS**: Seven prioritized user stories cover the complete feature set from foundational (configuration, logging) to security (authentication) to optional (rate limiting).
+
+✅ **PASS**: Ten success criteria provide measurable validation for all major functional areas.
+
+✅ **PASS**: Technical Requirements section appropriately references existing project standards rather than introducing new implementation details.
+
+## Overall Assessment
+
+**STATUS**: ✅ **READY FOR PLANNING**
+
+All checklist items pass validation. The specification is complete, testable, and ready for the `/speckit.plan` phase.
+
+## Notes
+
+- The specification successfully balances business requirements with project constitution compliance
+- User stories are well-prioritized with clear independent test criteria
+- Edge cases demonstrate thorough consideration of failure scenarios
+- Success criteria provide clear acceptance thresholds without prescribing implementation approaches