# Implementation Plan: [FEATURE]

**Branch**: `[###-feature-name]` | **Date**: [DATE] | **Spec**: [link]
**Input**: Feature specification from `/specs/[###-feature-name]/spec.md`

**Note**: This template is filled in by the `/speckit.plan` command. See `.specify/templates/commands/plan.md` for the execution workflow.

## Summary

[Extract from feature spec: primary requirement + technical approach from research]

## Technical Context

<!--
  ACTION REQUIRED: Replace the content in this section with the technical details
  for the project. The structure here is presented in advisory capacity to guide
  the iteration process.
-->

**Language/Version**: [e.g., Python 3.11, Swift 5.9, Rust 1.75 or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]  
**Primary Dependencies**: [e.g., FastAPI, UIKit, LLVM or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]  
**Storage**: [if applicable, e.g., PostgreSQL, CoreData, files or N/A]  
**Testing**: [e.g., pytest, XCTest, cargo test or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]  
**Target Platform**: [e.g., Linux server, iOS 15+, WASM or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
**Project Type**: [single/web/mobile - determines source structure]  
**Performance Goals**: [domain-specific, e.g., 1000 req/s, 10k lines/sec, 60 fps or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]  
**Constraints**: [domain-specific, e.g., <200ms p95, <100MB memory, offline-capable or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]  
**Scale/Scope**: [domain-specific, e.g., 10k users, 1M LOC, 50 screens or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]

## Constitution Check

*GATE: Must pass before Phase 0 research. Re-check after Phase 1 design.*

**Tech Stack Adherence**:
- [ ] Feature uses Fiber + GORM + Viper + Zap + Lumberjack.v2 + Validator + sonic JSON + Asynq + PostgreSQL
- [ ] No native calls bypass framework (no `database/sql`, `net/http`, `encoding/json` direct use)
- [ ] All HTTP operations use Fiber framework
- [ ] All database operations use GORM
- [ ] All async tasks use Asynq
- [ ] Uses Go official toolchain: `go fmt`, `go vet`, `golangci-lint`
- [ ] Uses Go Modules for dependency management

**Code Quality Standards**:
- [ ] Follows Handler → Service → Store → Model architecture
- [ ] Handler layer only handles HTTP, no business logic
- [ ] Service layer contains business logic with cross-module support
- [ ] Store layer manages all data access with transaction support
- [ ] Uses dependency injection via struct fields (not constructor patterns)
- [ ] Unified error codes in `pkg/errors/`
- [ ] Unified API responses via `pkg/response/`
- [ ] All constants defined in `pkg/constants/`
- [ ] All Redis keys managed via key generation functions (no hardcoded strings)
- [ ] **No hardcoded magic numbers or strings (3+ occurrences must be constants)**
- [ ] **Defined constants are used instead of hardcoding duplicate values**
- [ ] **Code comments prefer Chinese for readability (implementation comments in Chinese)**
- [ ] **Log messages use Chinese (Info/Warn/Error/Debug logs in Chinese)**
- [ ] **Error messages support Chinese (user-facing errors have Chinese messages)**
- [ ] All exported functions/types have Go-style doc comments
- [ ] Code formatted with `gofmt`
- [ ] Follows Effective Go and Go Code Review Comments

**Documentation Standards** (Constitution Principle VII):
- [ ] Feature summary docs placed in `docs/{feature-id}/` mirroring `specs/{feature-id}/`
- [ ] Summary doc filenames use Chinese (功能总结.md, 使用指南.md, etc.)
- [ ] Summary doc content uses Chinese
- [ ] README.md updated with brief Chinese summary (2-3 sentences)
- [ ] Documentation is concise for first-time contributors

**Go Idiomatic Design**:
- [ ] Package structure is flat (max 2-3 levels), organized by feature
- [ ] Interfaces are small (1-3 methods), defined at use site
- [ ] No Java-style patterns: no I-prefix, no Impl-suffix, no getters/setters
- [ ] Error handling is explicit (return errors, no panic/recover abuse)
- [ ] Uses composition over inheritance
- [ ] Uses goroutines and channels (not thread pools)
- [ ] Uses `context.Context` for cancellation and timeouts
- [ ] Naming follows Go conventions: short receivers, consistent abbreviations (URL, ID, HTTP)
- [ ] No Hungarian notation or type prefixes
- [ ] Simple constructors (New/NewXxx), no Builder pattern unless necessary

**Testing Standards**:
- [ ] Unit tests for all core business logic (Service layer)
- [ ] Integration tests for all API endpoints
- [ ] Tests use Go standard testing framework
- [ ] Test files named `*_test.go` in same directory
- [ ] Test functions use `Test` prefix, benchmarks use `Benchmark` prefix
- [ ] Table-driven tests for multiple test cases
- [ ] Test helpers marked with `t.Helper()`
- [ ] Tests are independent (no external service dependencies)
- [ ] Target coverage: 70%+ overall, 90%+ for core business

**User Experience Consistency**:
- [ ] All APIs use unified JSON response format
- [ ] Error responses include clear error codes and bilingual messages
- [ ] RESTful design principles followed
- [ ] Unified pagination parameters (page, page_size, total)
- [ ] Time fields use ISO 8601 format (RFC3339)
- [ ] Currency amounts use integers (cents) to avoid float precision issues

**Performance Requirements**:
- [ ] API response time (P95) < 200ms, (P99) < 500ms
- [ ] Batch operations use bulk queries/inserts
- [ ] All database queries have appropriate indexes
- [ ] List queries implement pagination (default 20, max 100)
- [ ] Non-realtime operations use async tasks
- [ ] Database and Redis connection pools properly configured
- [ ] Uses goroutines/channels for concurrency (not thread pools)
- [ ] Uses `context.Context` for timeout control
- [ ] Uses `sync.Pool` for frequently allocated objects

**Access Logging Standards** (Constitution Principle VIII):
- [ ] ALL HTTP requests logged to access.log without exception
- [ ] Request parameters (query + body) logged (limited to 50KB)
- [ ] Response parameters (body) logged (limited to 50KB)
- [ ] Logging happens via centralized Logger middleware (pkg/logger/Middleware())
- [ ] No middleware bypasses access logging (including auth failures, rate limits)
- [ ] Body truncation indicates "... (truncated)" when over 50KB limit
- [ ] Access log includes all required fields: method, path, query, status, duration_ms, request_id, ip, user_agent, user_id, request_body, response_body

## Project Structure

### Documentation (this feature)

**设计文档（specs/ 目录）**：开发前的规划和设计
```text
specs/[###-feature]/
├── plan.md              # This file (/speckit.plan command output)
├── research.md          # Phase 0 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── data-model.md        # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── quickstart.md        # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── contracts/           # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
└── tasks.md             # Phase 2 output (/speckit.tasks command - NOT created by /speckit.plan)
```

**总结文档（docs/ 目录）**：开发完成后的总结和使用指南（遵循 Constitution Principle VII）
```text
docs/[###-feature]/
├── 功能总结.md          # 功能概述、核心实现、技术要点（MUST 使用中文命名和内容）
├── 使用指南.md          # 如何使用该功能的详细说明（MUST 使用中文命名和内容）
└── 架构说明.md          # 架构设计和技术决策（可选，MUST 使用中文命名和内容）
```

**README.md 更新**：每次完成功能后 MUST 在 README.md 添加简短描述（2-3 句话，中文）

### Source Code (repository root)
<!--
  ACTION REQUIRED: Replace the placeholder tree below with the concrete layout
  for this feature. Delete unused options and expand the chosen structure with
  real paths (e.g., apps/admin, packages/something). The delivered plan must
  not include Option labels.
-->

```text
# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 1: Single project (DEFAULT)
src/
├── models/
├── services/
├── cli/
└── lib/

tests/
├── contract/
├── integration/
└── unit/

# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 2: Web application (when "frontend" + "backend" detected)
backend/
├── src/
│   ├── models/
│   ├── services/
│   └── api/
└── tests/

frontend/
├── src/
│   ├── components/
│   ├── pages/
│   └── services/
└── tests/

# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 3: Mobile + API (when "iOS/Android" detected)
api/
└── [same as backend above]

ios/ or android/
└── [platform-specific structure: feature modules, UI flows, platform tests]
```

**Structure Decision**: [Document the selected structure and reference the real
directories captured above]

## Complexity Tracking

> **Fill ONLY if Constitution Check has violations that must be justified**

| Violation | Why Needed | Simpler Alternative Rejected Because |
|-----------|------------|-------------------------------------|
| [e.g., 4th project] | [current need] | [why 3 projects insufficient] |
| [e.g., Repository pattern] | [specific problem] | [why direct DB access insufficient] |