Files
junhong_cmp_fiber/.specify/templates/plan-template.md

7.2 KiB

Implementation Plan: [FEATURE]

Branch: [###-feature-name] | Date: [DATE] | Spec: [link] Input: Feature specification from /specs/[###-feature-name]/spec.md

Note: This template is filled in by the /speckit.plan command. See .specify/templates/commands/plan.md for the execution workflow.

Summary

[Extract from feature spec: primary requirement + technical approach from research]

Technical Context

Language/Version: [e.g., Python 3.11, Swift 5.9, Rust 1.75 or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Primary Dependencies: [e.g., FastAPI, UIKit, LLVM or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Storage: [if applicable, e.g., PostgreSQL, CoreData, files or N/A]
Testing: [e.g., pytest, XCTest, cargo test or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Target Platform: [e.g., Linux server, iOS 15+, WASM or NEEDS CLARIFICATION] Project Type: [single/web/mobile - determines source structure]
Performance Goals: [domain-specific, e.g., 1000 req/s, 10k lines/sec, 60 fps or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Constraints: [domain-specific, e.g., <200ms p95, <100MB memory, offline-capable or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Scale/Scope: [domain-specific, e.g., 10k users, 1M LOC, 50 screens or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]

Constitution Check

GATE: Must pass before Phase 0 research. Re-check after Phase 1 design.

Tech Stack Adherence:

  • Feature uses Fiber + GORM + Viper + Zap + Lumberjack.v2 + Validator + sonic JSON + Asynq + PostgreSQL
  • No native calls bypass framework (no database/sql, net/http, encoding/json direct use)
  • All HTTP operations use Fiber framework
  • All database operations use GORM
  • All async tasks use Asynq
  • Uses Go official toolchain: go fmt, go vet, golangci-lint
  • Uses Go Modules for dependency management

Code Quality Standards:

  • Follows Handler → Service → Store → Model architecture
  • Handler layer only handles HTTP, no business logic
  • Service layer contains business logic with cross-module support
  • Store layer manages all data access with transaction support
  • Uses dependency injection via struct fields (not constructor patterns)
  • Unified error codes in pkg/errors/
  • Unified API responses via pkg/response/
  • All constants defined in pkg/constants/
  • All Redis keys managed via key generation functions (no hardcoded strings)
  • No hardcoded magic numbers or strings (3+ occurrences must be constants)
  • Defined constants are used instead of hardcoding duplicate values
  • Code comments prefer Chinese for readability (implementation comments in Chinese)
  • Log messages use Chinese (Info/Warn/Error/Debug logs in Chinese)
  • Error messages support Chinese (user-facing errors have Chinese messages)
  • All exported functions/types have Go-style doc comments
  • Code formatted with gofmt
  • Follows Effective Go and Go Code Review Comments

Go Idiomatic Design:

  • Package structure is flat (max 2-3 levels), organized by feature
  • Interfaces are small (1-3 methods), defined at use site
  • No Java-style patterns: no I-prefix, no Impl-suffix, no getters/setters
  • Error handling is explicit (return errors, no panic/recover abuse)
  • Uses composition over inheritance
  • Uses goroutines and channels (not thread pools)
  • Uses context.Context for cancellation and timeouts
  • Naming follows Go conventions: short receivers, consistent abbreviations (URL, ID, HTTP)
  • No Hungarian notation or type prefixes
  • Simple constructors (New/NewXxx), no Builder pattern unless necessary

Testing Standards:

  • Unit tests for all core business logic (Service layer)
  • Integration tests for all API endpoints
  • Tests use Go standard testing framework
  • Test files named *_test.go in same directory
  • Test functions use Test prefix, benchmarks use Benchmark prefix
  • Table-driven tests for multiple test cases
  • Test helpers marked with t.Helper()
  • Tests are independent (no external service dependencies)
  • Target coverage: 70%+ overall, 90%+ for core business

User Experience Consistency:

  • All APIs use unified JSON response format
  • Error responses include clear error codes and bilingual messages
  • RESTful design principles followed
  • Unified pagination parameters (page, page_size, total)
  • Time fields use ISO 8601 format (RFC3339)
  • Currency amounts use integers (cents) to avoid float precision issues

Performance Requirements:

  • API response time (P95) < 200ms, (P99) < 500ms
  • Batch operations use bulk queries/inserts
  • All database queries have appropriate indexes
  • List queries implement pagination (default 20, max 100)
  • Non-realtime operations use async tasks
  • Database and Redis connection pools properly configured
  • Uses goroutines/channels for concurrency (not thread pools)
  • Uses context.Context for timeout control
  • Uses sync.Pool for frequently allocated objects

Project Structure

Documentation (this feature)

specs/[###-feature]/
├── plan.md              # This file (/speckit.plan command output)
├── research.md          # Phase 0 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── data-model.md        # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── quickstart.md        # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── contracts/           # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
└── tasks.md             # Phase 2 output (/speckit.tasks command - NOT created by /speckit.plan)

Source Code (repository root)

# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 1: Single project (DEFAULT)
src/
├── models/
├── services/
├── cli/
└── lib/

tests/
├── contract/
├── integration/
└── unit/

# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 2: Web application (when "frontend" + "backend" detected)
backend/
├── src/
│   ├── models/
│   ├── services/
│   └── api/
└── tests/

frontend/
├── src/
│   ├── components/
│   ├── pages/
│   └── services/
└── tests/

# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 3: Mobile + API (when "iOS/Android" detected)
api/
└── [same as backend above]

ios/ or android/
└── [platform-specific structure: feature modules, UI flows, platform tests]

Structure Decision: [Document the selected structure and reference the real directories captured above]

Complexity Tracking

Fill ONLY if Constitution Check has violations that must be justified

Violation Why Needed Simpler Alternative Rejected Because
[e.g., 4th project] [current need] [why 3 projects insufficient]
[e.g., Repository pattern] [specific problem] [why direct DB access insufficient]